11月1日雅思大作文示范寫作 | 科技農業(yè) VS 天然種植

掃碼咨詢2025年新航道秋季班

November 3, 2025

雅思作文真題直擊 | | 欄目推送說明

每場雅思考試之后，第一時間分享本場考試雅思A類大作文的范文權威解析。歡迎每周鎖定。

本期作者：張婷婷

2025年11月1日雅思大作文題目

Some people think that it is better to use scientific techniques to grow food, while others think that we should grow food naturally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

題目分析：這道題目屬于典型雙邊討論的議論文，寫作任務必須三點俱全：

1. 科學種植方的論點與論據(jù)；

2. 自然種植方的論點與論據(jù)；

3. 作者明確立場：考生必須自己“定義”better：產量更高？環(huán)境更可持續(xù)？經(jīng)濟更可行？

關鍵詞：

1. scientific techniques

顯性含義：轉基因(genetic modification), 化肥(chemical fertilizer), 農藥(pesticide), 溫室(greenhouse), 垂直農場(vertical farm)等。

隱性考點：效率(efficiency), 產量(yield), 抗風險(resilience), 生態(tài)副作用(externalities)。

2. grow food naturally

顯性含義：有機(organic), 無農藥(pesticide-free), 輪作(crop rotation), 農業(yè)生態(tài)學(agro-ecology), 再生農業(yè)(regenerative farming)。

隱性考點：食品安全(food safety), 生物多樣性(biodiversity)、土壤健康(soil health)、文化與傳統(tǒng)(heritage)。

范文及解析

Introduction

In recent decades, the debate over food farming methods has become increasingly contentious. While some individuals firmly advocate the use of scientific technologies, there are those who staunchly oppose it, insisting that naturally-grown crops are far more beneficial to human well-being and the environment.

解析

? contentious adj.有爭議的，引起爭論的；

? staunchly adv.堅定地；忠實地；

譯文參考：

近幾十年來，關于糧食種植方式的爭議日益激烈。部分人士堅決主張運用科學技術，而另一些人則強烈反對，認為天然種植的作物對人類健康和環(huán)境更為有益。

Body paragraph 1

Proponents of scientific farming highlight its significant edge in terms of boosting output. High-yield crop varieties, developed through genetic modification, possess remarkable pest and drought resistance, which traditional crops, constrained by their natural genetic traits, rarely have. A prime example is hybrid rice, which has made a substantial contribution to addressing global food security challenges by greatly increasing yield compared to conventional inbred rice. In addition, hydroponics and vertical farming, two groundbreaking scientific methods, allow food to be grown in barren lands, which, in turn, diminishes the need for deforestation to expand farmland,thereby better protecting ecological equilibrium. For densely populated countries, these technologies are not merely convenient but necessary to feed expanding populations without further deforestation or environmental degradation.

解析

? proponents n. <正式> 支持者，建議者；

? boost v.使增長，推動；

? genetic modification基因改造、基因轉變；

? constrain v.驅使；強迫；

? hybrid adj.混合的；雜交成的；

? substantial adj.大量的，價值巨大的；

? address v.處理，設法解決；

? hydroponics n.水栽培，水耕法；

? vertical farming 垂直農業(yè)；

? groundbreaking adj.開創(chuàng)性的；

? barren adj.貧瘠的，不毛的；不結果實的；

? equilibrium n.平衡，均衡；

譯文參考：

科學種植的支持者強調其在提高產量方面的顯著優(yōu)勢。通過基因改造培育的高產作物品種，具備傳統(tǒng)作物因天然遺傳特性所限而罕見的出色抗蟲性與耐旱性。雜交水稻便是典型例證——相較于傳統(tǒng)常規(guī)秈稻，其產量大幅提升，為應對全球糧食安全挑戰(zhàn)作出了重要貢獻。此外，水培法與垂直農業(yè)這兩種創(chuàng)新性科學種植方式，能夠在貧瘠土地上實現(xiàn)糧食種植，進而減少為擴大耕地而砍伐森林的需求，從而更好地維護生態(tài)平衡。對于人口稠密的國家而言，這些技術不僅便捷實用，更是在避免進一步砍伐森林或環(huán)境惡化的前提下，養(yǎng)活不斷增長人口的必要舉措。

Body paragraph 2

Opponents, conversely, argue that naturally-grown crops offer more tangible boons. They point out that organic agriculture avoids the use of artificial chemicals, which may leave toxic residues in food and contaminate soil and water sources. Traditional crop rotation, a practice that has been employed for centuries, preserves soil fertility without relying on synthetic additives. This eco-friendly approach is often unattainable in modern intensive farming, which heavily depends on chemical inputs. For consumers increasingly concerned about food safety and environmental impact, natural produce offers a more sustainable and healthy choice.

解析

? tangible adj.明確的，真實的；

? boon n.裨益，優(yōu)勢，有用的東西；

? residue n.剩余物，殘留物；

? contaminate v.污染，弄臟；

? fertility n.肥沃，富饒；

? synthetic adj.合成的，人造的；

? additive n.添加劑，添加物；

? unattainable adj.做不到的；難到達的；

譯文參考：

相反，反對者認為，天然種植的作物具有更為切實的益處。他們指出，有機農業(yè)不使用那些可能在食品中殘留有毒物質，并污染土壤與水源的人工合成化學品。已有數(shù)百年應用歷史的傳統(tǒng)輪作制度，無需依賴合成添加劑即可維持土壤肥力。這種生態(tài)友好型種植方式，在嚴重依賴化學投入品的現(xiàn)代集約化農業(yè)中往往難以實現(xiàn)。對于日益關注食品安全與環(huán)境影響的消費者而言，天然農產品無疑是更具可持續(xù)性的健康之選。

Conclusion

In my opinion, neither extreme position is advisable. Scientific food production addresses the urgent need for quantity and efficiency, while natural farming ensures quality and environmental sustainability. A balanced approach that harnesses the strengths of both methods—supporting technological innovation alongside responsible organic practices—will best enable humanity to achieve food security without compromising the health of people or the planet.

解析

? harness v.控制并利用；連接，串聯(lián)；

? innovation n.新事物，新方法；革新，創(chuàng)新；

? compromise v.妥協(xié)，讓步；

譯文參考：

在我個人看來，兩種極端立場均不可取。科學化食品生產可滿足對產量與效率的迫切需求，而天然種植則能保障產品質量與環(huán)境可持續(xù)性。因此，一種兼具兩者優(yōu)勢的均衡路徑——既支持技術創(chuàng)新，又倡導負責任的有機農業(yè)實踐——方能最有效地助力人類實現(xiàn)糧食安全，同時不損害人類健康與地球生態(tài)。

如果你寫雅思大作文時總是：開頭卡殼、詞窮寫不滿；寫了很多篇，分數(shù)卻卡在6分……老師真的理解你那種“很努力卻提不上分”的焦慮。

秋季是提分關鍵期，新航道雅思課程重點針對：

拆透題型結構，寫作有章可循；

真題練+逐句改，提升思路和表達；

積累詞匯句型，擺脫機械套模板。

11/12月報名享專屬優(yōu)惠

別等到考前焦慮，掃碼立刻咨詢你的提分方案